When I decided to do my paper on plastic waste in New Zealand’s
marine environment, I naively imagined I would be overwhelmed with the number
of sources of research data and statistics on this global problem. It features readily in popular science
magazines, on the internet and in the global news. The “Great Pacific Garbage Patch” is well
publicised, as are images of trash littering the beaches and oceans, birds and
marine life wrapped in rubbish, or graphic autopsy images showing the plastic
waste in their stomachs that has caused them to starve to death. Surely there is a lot of research to back
this up?
And so it was disappointing when researching this “popular”
topic that reliable data sources on the questions I was wanting answered were
few and far between – and in some cases absent altogether. How much plastic waste was New Zealand
producing, and how much was ending up in the sea? What damage was this doing to our very
special marine and birdlife? What had
New Zealand put in place to reduce the pollution problem and was it having any
affect?
Frustratingly, while searching the resources through the
Massey library, a lot of articles around the plastic waste issue were from
20-30 years ago – hardly constituting “current” data. Looking at the reference lists on the few recent
articles that I did find was useful – although interestingly the articles that
these authors referenced in their research, were the same ones I had found from
the 80s and 90s.
Avenue number two was the old fall-back to Google, many
articles in the popular press exist on the subject and I hoped that some for
these would give their references. The National Geographic website mentioned one
large study happening by CSIRO, Australia's national science agency, but it had yet to be finalised or published. An article in the New Zealand Herald talked of a journal
article which sounded perfect – only to find the Massey Library didn’t have free
access. And so the frustration increased,
but with perseverance (and a couple of wines) I finally had a few articles to
work from for part A.
The last piece of my formidable detective work was to find
the opposing side – part B of my quest. But
who opposes reducing pollution? Surely no-one.
But looking deeper, the question isn’t about not doing anything, but
about doing more. A possible view some
people in New Zealand may have, is that as long as we recycle our rubbish we
are indeed doing enough - and so I hunted - but that illusive article still
hides from me stating what improvement recycling has made to the marine
environment.
What I started out thinking would be a nice orderly pile of journal
articles to sort through, like logs evenly piled up (think Jenga), quickly
become the veritable “needle in a haystack” that only Miss Marple or Jessica Fletcher could tackle. So now, with a slightly
smaller stack of articles around me than at first expected, I sit down at last
to write my first draft…
3 comments:
I feel your frustration when researching “Popular or Current” topics the articles are less scientific and more personal interest. I just hope your perseverance pays off for you. I am going to do further research and I hope I will not need any detective work done.
Not Easy but perserverence seems to have paid off. It seems we all had our challenges with the research.
It seems that you've done a good amount of research so far. I like the detective work analogy and Agatha Christie reference. I can understand the trickiness of finding suitable sources that help you answer your research question all too well.
Post a Comment